No room for complacency

My last blog was fairly upbeat about the UK Government’s interim response to the consultation on Online Harms. True the response was light on concrete proposals but much of the language was excellent. The overall tone was tough and purposeful.

Did I speak too soon or too naively? I say that because the day after the response appeared, in The Times, this article popped up under the headline “Boris Johnson set to water down curbs on tech giants”. 

It had all the hallmarks of an insider briefing, opening with the following

“The prime minister is preparing to soften plans for sanctions on social media companies amid concerns about a backlash from tech giants.

and

“There is a very pro-tech lobby in No 10,” a well-placed source said. “They got spooked by some of the coverage around online harms and raised concerns about the reaction of the technology companies. There is a real nervousness about it.”

Lest we forget, every Government in the world is to some degree conflicted. They want the jobs, prosperity and glitz that inward investment by hi-tech companies brings.

Against that is the day-to-day reality. Members of Parliament in the UK and  their equivalents in many other countries are constantly being visited by, or receiving emails and letters from, concerned parents, teachers and others about something horrible that has happened to one of their children or some other vulnerable individual. Children themselves have not been silent and their views broadly mirror everyone else’s.

So  is the scene set for a titanic struggle? We should assume it is and prepare accordingly because, as I have remarked before, the goodies don’t always win and the baddies don’t always lose.

The Government is going to be in an awkward position. They will not want to be seen as apologists for Silicon Valley.  They will not want to say, in effect

 “Chill. We are all going to have to  learn to live with these dangers to children or threats to us all from terrorists and scam artists. It is the price we have to pay in perpetuity for the benefits the internet brings. And yes we’re sorry the guys who own the companies that allow these things to happen have become obscenely rich off the back of your woes but even so we musn’t be too harsh on them.”

Yet, post-Brexit,  with a Free Trade Agreement with the USA very much in their sights, the pressure on the UK Government to dial it down could become immense. If any real signs of that happening emerge we need to urge Parliament to “take back control” and “get Online Harms done.”

Slogans such as those at least have the advantage of being familiar.

About John Carr

John Carr is one of the world's leading authorities on children's and young people's use of digital technologies. He is Senior Technical Adviser to Bangkok-based global NGO ECPAT International, Technical Adviser to the European NGO Alliance for Child Safety Online, which is administered by Save the Children Italy and an Advisory Council Member of Beyond Borders (Canada). Amongst other things John is or has been an Adviser to the United Nations, ITU, the European Union, the Council of Europe and European Union Agency for Network and Information Security and is a former Board Member of the UK Council for Child Internet Safety. He is Secretary of the UK's Children's Charities' Coalition on Internet Safety. John has advised many of the world's largest internet companies on online child safety. In June, 2012, John was appointed a Visiting Senior Fellow at the London School of Economics and Political Science. More: http://johncarrcv.blogspot.com
This entry was posted in Age verification, Child abuse images, Default settings, E-commerce, Internet governance, Regulation, Self-regulation, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.